ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Dominant and Nondominant Side Patterns in Hamstring Stiffness and Clinical Flexibility in Amateur Football Players and Healthy Controls.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFootball-specific loading may be associated with different dominant and nondominant (D and ND) side patterns in hamstring stiffness and clinical flexibility. This study compared D and ND side patterns in semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus (SM), and biceps femoris (BF) stiffness and in active knee extension (AKE) and straight leg raise (SLR) measurements between amateur football players and healthy controls.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 50 amateur football players and 50 healthy controls without organized athletic participation. Bilateral ST, SM, and BF stiffness values were measured using shear wave elastography (SWE). Clinical hamstring flexibility was assessed with AKE and SLR tests. D and ND side differences were examined within each group, and side difference patterns were compared between groups.
resultsIn football players, SM stiffness was higher on the dominant side (D-ND estimate, 1.25 kPa, p = 0.012). In controls, BF stiffness was higher on the nondominant side (D-ND estimate, - 0.90 kPa, p = 0.044). In the primary between group comparison, only the BF D-ND difference differed significantly, with opposite directions of side difference between groups (between group estimate, 1.74 kPa, p = 0.013). Controls also showed dominant side AKE and SLR differences of 1.00° and 1.50°, both below reported measurement error thresholds.
conclusionsD and ND side patterns in hamstring stiffness and clinical flexibility varied according to the muscle, test, and group studied. The main between group difference emerged through BF stiffness, whereas the AKE and SLR differences observed in controls were limited in magnitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.