Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469491›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: A Narrative Review of Deep Learning Methods, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.

Taofeeq Oluwatosin Togunwa, Theophilus Olayiwola, Halleluyah Darasinmi Oludele, Oluwatosin E Fatade, Adesola Adepoju, Ayomide Adeyemi, Michael M Haglund, Bradley J Kolls, Godwin I Ogbole, Alvan-Emeka K Ukachukwu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taofeeq Oluwatosin TogunwaDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Theophilus OlayiwolaCollege of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Halleluyah Darasinmi OludeleCollege of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oluwatosin E FatadeDepartment of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adesola AdepojuDepartment of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ayomide AdeyemiDepartment of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Michael M HaglundDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradley J KollsDuke Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Durham, NC, USA.
Godwin I OgboleDepartment of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Alvan-Emeka K UkachukwuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA. dr.alvan01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-7649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke management is time-sensitive, and lesion segmentation supports treatment selection, prognostication, and reproducible quantification. Deep learning (DL) aims to accelerate and standardize lesion delineation to augment neuroimaging workflows. We conducted a narrative review of DL-based ischemic stroke lesion segmentation studies published from 2020 to 2025. PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched; ~ 500 records were identified, and 40 full-text studies were included after screening. We extracted imaging modality, architecture, segmentation targets, and reported performance (primarily Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) for descriptive synthesis; exploratory LOESS curves were used only to visualize broader temporal trends and were not interpreted inferentially. U-Net backbones and variants remained dominant, with gains from residual and attention mechanisms and standardized pipelines. On MRI (especially DWI/ADC), many studies reported DSC > 0.80; residual/attention U-Nets reached ~ 0.87 and nnU-Net achieved ~ 0.80-0.82. Since 2023, transformer-based and ensemble approaches have increasingly appeared among top-performing MRI models, with multisite DWI reports approaching ~ 0.90. CT/NCCT segmentation was more variable, with typical research DSC ~ 0.35-0.65, but late-period hybrid CNN-transformer, ensemble, and multimodal approaches reported DSC approaching ~ 0.8, and NCCT tools report higher performance. Overall trends suggested gradual improvement for MRI and a U-shaped trajectory for CT. DL stroke lesion segmentation is maturing toward clinical viability, most convincingly for MRI, while CT applications remain constrained by subtle early ischemic change and generalization challenges. Many studies remain retrospective and may not reflect real-world performance and access constraints, reinforcing the need for prospective, multicenter validation and scalable deployment pathways to enable equitable impact.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningIschemic strokeLesion segmentationMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.