ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: A Narrative Review of Deep Learning Methods, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke management is time-sensitive, and lesion segmentation supports treatment selection, prognostication, and reproducible quantification. Deep learning (DL) aims to accelerate and standardize lesion delineation to augment neuroimaging workflows. We conducted a narrative review of DL-based ischemic stroke lesion segmentation studies published from 2020 to 2025. PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched; ~ 500 records were identified, and 40 full-text studies were included after screening. We extracted imaging modality, architecture, segmentation targets, and reported performance (primarily Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) for descriptive synthesis; exploratory LOESS curves were used only to visualize broader temporal trends and were not interpreted inferentially. U-Net backbones and variants remained dominant, with gains from residual and attention mechanisms and standardized pipelines. On MRI (especially DWI/ADC), many studies reported DSC > 0.80; residual/attention U-Nets reached ~ 0.87 and nnU-Net achieved ~ 0.80-0.82. Since 2023, transformer-based and ensemble approaches have increasingly appeared among top-performing MRI models, with multisite DWI reports approaching ~ 0.90. CT/NCCT segmentation was more variable, with typical research DSC ~ 0.35-0.65, but late-period hybrid CNN-transformer, ensemble, and multimodal approaches reported DSC approaching ~ 0.8, and NCCT tools report higher performance. Overall trends suggested gradual improvement for MRI and a U-shaped trajectory for CT. DL stroke lesion segmentation is maturing toward clinical viability, most convincingly for MRI, while CT applications remain constrained by subtle early ischemic change and generalization challenges. Many studies remain retrospective and may not reflect real-world performance and access constraints, reinforcing the need for prospective, multicenter validation and scalable deployment pathways to enable equitable impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.