ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic changes in amygdala and insula responses to the onset and offset of conditioned stimuli during threat learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amygdala and insula are central to learning how to anticipate and respond to threats, yet their precise roles during different phases of fear conditioning remain incompletely understood. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine amygdala and insula responses in a large sample (N = 286) of adult twins during fear conditioning. Participants were exposed to two virtual characters: one (CS +) was paired with a mild electric shock (US) on 50% of acquisition trials (partial reinforcement), while the other (CS -) was never paired with the US. During habituation, neither the amygdala nor the insula discriminated between the cues. During acquisition, amygdala responses were strongest and most consistent at CS + offset on non-reinforced CS + trials (i.e., when the US was expected but omitted), whereas insula responses differentiated CS + from CS - at both CS onset and CS offset. Whole-brain analyses showed that CS differentiation at CS onset expanded from early engagement of anterior insula and temporal regions to broader networks as learning progressed. CS differentiation at CS offset (non-reinforced CS + > CS -) emerged in posterior insula and extended to broader predominantly contralateral networks in later acquisition blocks. Voxel-wise pattern similarity analyses indicated high within-event similarity across acquisition blocks (onset-with-onset; offset-with-offset), but lower similarity between event types (onset vs offset) and between either CS-related event and the US. Together, these findings are consistent with partially distinct large-scale activation patterns across cue onset, omission-related cue offset, and US delivery during threat learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.