ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliability and validity of the DEFISS score for predicting post-extubation dysphagia and dysphagia-related reintubation after stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-extubation dysphagia is frequent after severe stroke and can lead to pneumonia, delayed recovery, and dysphagia-related reintubation. We evaluated the Determine Extubation Failure in Severe Stroke (DEFISS) score, a bedside tool combining stroke-specific clinical factors, duration of mechanical ventilation, and a brief oral motor function assessment to support pre-extubation risk stratification. In a prospective single-center cohort, three blinded raters (novice, intermediate, expert) independently scored DEFISS immediately before planned extubation, which followed routine clinical care. After extubation, all patients underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing by assessors blinded to DEFISS. The primary outcome was dysphagia-related reintubation within 120 h, and construct validity was assessed against the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale. Thirty-nine stroke patients (mean age 73.9 ± 11.6 years; 54% female) were included; five (12.8%) experienced dysphagia-related reintubation. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC_single 0.887; ICC_average 0.959), with similarly high reliability for the oral motor function component (ICC_single 0.874). DEFISS correlated with endoscopic dysphagia severity (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.005). Using a prespecified cutoff (DEFISS ≥ 4), odds of dysphagia-related reintubation increased (OR 11.1, p = 0.035) with sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.73. DEFISS may provide a pragmatic triage tool to prioritize early FEES and targeted dysphagia management in critically ill stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.