Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An end-to-end deep learning pipeline for urban noise monitoring with spatiotemporal analysis.

Mehmet Ali Yalçınkaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mehmet Ali YalçınkayaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, 40100, Türkiye. mehmetyalcinkaya@ahievran.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-5643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban noise pollution is a critical public health problem affecting millions of people around the world. Current acoustic monitoring systems largely focus on optimizing classification accuracy but fail to meet operational requirements such as calibrated probability outputs, deployment formats, and spatiotemporal integration. This study presents a comprehensive urban noise monitoring pipeline extending from raw sensor data to city-scale policy support. The proposed framework uses a CNN14-based ensemble architecture on the SONYC-UST dataset collected from 56 acoustic sensors deployed across New York City. The system performs simultaneous multi-source detection across 35 hierarchical acoustic presence labels and provides reliable probability calibration validated by a Brier score of 0.1269. In terms of technical infrastructure, the pipeline offers export in TorchScript format that can run on edge devices without Python dependency, processing capacity of more than 2,000 audio segments per second on an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and training time of less than six hours per fold. Integrated 250-meter spatial grid mapping and hourly-daily temporal aggregation modules enable direct integration of predictions into urban planning workflows. Independent external corroboration was performed using NYC 311 complaint records across 3,460 matched grid-day observations. Permutation testing revealed a statistically significant relationship between predicted noise scores and community-reported disturbance. This study demonstrates that model accuracy alone is not sufficient for deployable urban noise monitoring systems, and that a holistic approach encompassing calibration, deployment, and spatial integration is required.

Indexed as

Acoustic event detectionAudio signal processingEnvironmental noise monitoringProbabilistic model calibrationSpatiotemporal analysisUrban sound classification

Identifiers

PMID42469314
PMCPMC13379589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.