ArticleScientific reports2026
General semantic, personal semantic and episodic details when thinking about the past and the future in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relational memory supports the binding of the arbitrary relations between elements of experience to create durable representations of our lives over time, an ability that is disrupted following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Much of the work on relational memory in TBI comes from studies on the recall of specific events from one's personal past, that is, episodic memory. Recent work suggests relational memory may also be recruited in support of representations of general semantics (i.e., knowledge of the world) and personal semantics (i.e., knowledge about the self and one's life). In the present study, we assessed whether the repercussions of TBI on relational memory extend beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics using similar tasks focused on elaboration. Thirty individuals with moderate-severe TBI and 30 non-injured participants (NCs) generated narratives across four life chapters (adolescence, remote past, recent past, future) and three memory types (general semantics, personal semantics, and episodic memory). A mixed effects model revealed a significant effect of Group, without any interaction, consistent with the TBI group having generated fewer details than the NC group across all chapters and memory types. The provision of specific probes reduced the differences between groups, except for the autobiographical facts of the future chapter. The study assessed a uniquely large spectrum of memory types and showed that relational memory dysfunction in TBI extends beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics, for both the past and future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.