Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469288›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Application of machine learning decision tree based power switching control for a standalone PV system with grid support.

K R Pushpa, R S Geetha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K R PushpaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering (Affiliated to V.T.U, Belagavi), Bangalore, India. pushpakr@pes.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3961-4937
R S GeethaB.M.S. College of Engineering Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BMSCE, Bangalore, India. rsgeetha.eee@bmsce.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0635-5905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring reliable power delivery in standalone photovoltaic (PV) systems is challenging due to the intermittent nature of solar irradiance and dynamic load variations. Conventional switching control schemes often fail to maintain optimal performance under such varying conditions, leading to reduced efficiency and delayed source transition. Although several studies have explored PV converter control and MPPT algorithms, the integration of machine learning techniques for real-time switching control in standalone PV systems with grid backup remains an emerging area. This research work aims to address the identified gap by developing an ML- Decision Tree based switching strategy that enhances power management and system efficiency. This paper presents applying switching rules to choose the correct power source and train a machine learning model to predict future switching for a standalone PV system that operates autonomously and sources power from the utility grid only when solar energy becomes insufficient. The proposed control framework employs real-time monitoring of PV array voltage, current, irradiance, and load demand as input features to the trained DT model, which predicts the optimal switching decision between PV and grid supply. The Simulation work carried out in this paper using MATLAB/Simulink demonstrates application of machine learning - Decision Tree based switching to automate switching operation with reduced switching losses and improved voltage regulation compared to rule based conventional switching in a PV system.

Indexed as

Data-Driven ControlDecision Tree (DT)Machine LearningPhotovoltaic (PV) SystemSwitching ControlTotal Harmonic Distortion (THD)

Identifiers

PMID42469288
PMCPMC13379583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.