ArticleScientific data2026
RFDD: A High-Quality Dataset based on Metrology for Fastener Defect Detection in High-Speed Railways.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents the Railway Fastener Defect Dataset (RFDD), a high-quality, metrology-oriented benchmark designed for intelligent inspection of high-speed railway infrastructure. Unlike existing datasets that mainly rely on cropped single-fastener images with limited defect categories, RFDD preserves full-scene railway inspection layouts and introduces engineering-oriented defect definitions based on measurable operational maintenance criteria. The dataset comprises 1,350 high-resolution full-scene images (2048 × 2021) containing more than 8,100 annotated fastener instances, including one Normal class and five representative defect categories: Missing, Inverted, Displaced, Deformed, and Fractured. The dataset is constructed using a systematic framework governed by six visual consistency principles spanning geometry, optics, boundary gradient, noise, texture, and occlusion, thereby ensuring metrological consistency and engineering realism. All images preserve the original multi-fastener spatial layouts and are provided with high-precision pixel-level semantic annotations. In addition, comprehensive technical validation was conducted using multiple state-of-the-art detection architectures. Experimental results demonstrate that RFDD provides a realistic, reliable, and challenging benchmark for evaluating advanced computer vision algorithms and intelligent sensing systems under practical railway inspection conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.