Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469220›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Distinct Roles of Deep and Superficial Cortical Layers in Tone Prediction, Comparison, and Adaptation in Human Auditory Cortices.

Jorie J G van Haren, Floris P de Lange, Sonja A Kotz, Federico De Martino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorie J G van HarenDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jjg.vanharen@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8868-9276
Floris P de Lange *Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-1452
Sonja A Kotz *Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-4624
Federico De MartinoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-0648

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101001270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory perception relies on prior sensations to form expectations and adapt to repeated inputs. Yet, how these processes interact with frequency-specific preference across cortical depth remains unclear. Using ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (at 7T), participants listened to stochastic tone sequences varying in their repetition structure and predictability. We modelled voxel-wise responses for stimulus preference, repetition suppression, and expectations, partitioning their unique and shared variance across three depth bins (infragranular, granular, supragranular). Expectation-related signals explained most unique variance in deep layers, aligning with internal model representations. Variance jointly explained by stimulus preference and expectation was instead strongest in superficial layers, consistent with the content-specific alignment of top-down predictions (prediction error signalling). Finally, repetition suppression accounted for variance uniformly across depth. Together, the data suggest that deep layers contain content-specific predictive models, superficial layers register prediction-input alignment, and repetition suppression provides a depth-invariant, local gain control that complements predictive processing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42469220
PMCPMC13493366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.