ArticleNature communications2026
Distinct Roles of Deep and Superficial Cortical Layers in Tone Prediction, Comparison, and Adaptation in Human Auditory Cortices.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct Roles of Deep and Superficial Cortical Layers in Tone Prediction, Comparison, and Adaptation in Human Auditory Cortices.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory perception relies on prior sensations to form expectations and adapt to repeated inputs. Yet, how these processes interact with frequency-specific preference across cortical depth remains unclear. Using ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (at 7T), participants listened to stochastic tone sequences varying in their repetition structure and predictability. We modelled voxel-wise responses for stimulus preference, repetition suppression, and expectations, partitioning their unique and shared variance across three depth bins (infragranular, granular, supragranular). Expectation-related signals explained most unique variance in deep layers, aligning with internal model representations. Variance jointly explained by stimulus preference and expectation was instead strongest in superficial layers, consistent with the content-specific alignment of top-down predictions (prediction error signalling). Finally, repetition suppression accounted for variance uniformly across depth. Together, the data suggest that deep layers contain content-specific predictive models, superficial layers register prediction-input alignment, and repetition suppression provides a depth-invariant, local gain control that complements predictive processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.