ArticleBDJ open2026
Evaluation of a 24-month longitudinal dental foundation training scheme pilot.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA 24-month longitudinal Dental Foundation Training (DFT) was piloted by Health Education England (HEE), now NHS Workforce, Training & Education (WT&E) from 2022-24 across London, Kent, Sussex and Surrey (KSS) region. This study evaluated the feasibility, strengths, and areas for improvement within the 24-month training model.
methodsA mixed methods design compared the 24-month longitudinal scheme with the standard 12-month DFT over a two-year period. Purpose-designed questionnaires captured quantitative and qualitative feedback on key training elements, while focus groups explored trainees' expectations, experiences and perceived challenges in greater depth.
resultsParticipants included 24 trainees on the 24-month longitudinal scheme and 63 foundation dentists undertaking the standard model. Trainees on the 24-month longitudinal scheme reported notable benefits, including broader clinical exposure across practice, community and hospital settings, improved confidence and enhanced preparedness for future career decisions. They also identified opportunities for improvement relating to logistical arrangements, aspects of induction, communication from training programme directors and timeliness of information on competencies and assessments.
conclusionsThis evaluation shows that longitudinal DFT provides clear benefits for early-career dentists through enhanced skills, wider clinical exposure and improved career readiness. Insights from the pilot have positively informed curriculum refinement and regional service development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.