ArticleNature communications2026
Bootstrapping multimodal large language model with medical knowledge for automatic esophagogastroduodenoscopy diagnosis and reporting.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an essential clinical procedure for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, while the subsequent EGD reports play a vital role in clinical decision-making and therapeutic interventions. This paper makes the first attempt to bootstrap Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) with medical knowledge for EGD diagnosis and reporting (EDR). We collected the largest multicentric EGD dataset so far, containing 4461 participants with 203,838 EGD images and 4461 corresponding EGD reports. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method, MLLM-EDR, achieves an average diagnostic accuracy of 0.882 for nineteen GI diseases, outperforming both state-of-the-art AI models (0.720) and junior endoscopists (0.784). The completeness and facticity scores of our generated reports match the quality of those created by senior endoscopists. Moreover, our method substantially reduces the endoscopists' workload from 7 minutes to 13.48 seconds. These results highlight the vigor and significance of MLLM-EDR for AI-assisted EGD diagnostic and reporting applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.