ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2026
Repercussions of Diagnostic Delay in Rare Diseases.
Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases (RDs) are often subject to diagnostic delays due to their low prevalence, clinical variability, and limited professional awareness. This scoping review aimed to map the literature on these delays, examining their clinical, emotional, and socioeconomic consequences. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review identified 23 studies published between 2010 and 2025. The included studies spanned 13 countries, with a notable concentration in Europe and increasing publication trends in recent years, reflecting growing international recognition of the challenges associated with delayed diagnosis. Across diverse study designs and disease contexts, commonly reported consequences included misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, psychological distress such as anxiety and frustration, disease progression, increased healthcare utilization, social isolation, reduced quality of life, and financial burden. These findings underscore the broad clinical and psychosocial impact experienced by patients during delayed diagnostic processes. Reducing diagnostic delay in RDs requires coordinated public health efforts, improved diagnostic infrastructure, and greater investment in professional training. Such efforts are essential to ensure earlier diagnosis, improve health outcomes and quality of life, as well as to enable timely access to genetic counseling to better support patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.