ArticleTobacco control2026
Correlates of oral nicotine pouch use, use frequency and flavour use among US adults.
Article in Tobacco control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have gained popularity in the US, little is known from nationally representative data about who uses them and how they are being used.
objectivesTo examine tobacco use and sociodemographic correlates of ONP use, use frequency and flavour use among US adults.
methodsData were drawn from the 2022-2023 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (n=1 57 485). Weighted logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of (1) current ONP use, (2) daily versus non-daily ONP use and (3) flavoured versus unflavoured ONP use.
resultsThe odds of current ONP use were higher among younger adults, males, non-Hispanic Whites, individuals with higher income and those who had ever used cigarettes, e-cigarettes or smokeless tobacco (SLT). People who currently use cigarettes, e-cigarettes or SLT had lower odds of daily (vs non-daily) ONP use, whereas people with a history of cigarette use who do not currently smoke had higher odds. Males, younger adults and people with a history of SLT use who do not currently use SLT were more likely to use flavoured ONPs.
conclusionsONP use was common among individuals with current and prior tobacco use which may be consistent with alternative nicotine use. However, a small proportion of ONP users reported no prior use of other tobacco products, highlighting the need for continued research on nicotine uptake through ONPs among tobacco-naïve populations, particularly among young adults. In addition, the prevalence of co-use with other tobacco products may limit potential public health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.