Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469015›Full record

ArticleGenome research2026

Identification of genomic features that uniquely impact estrogen receptor alpha binding and its effects on gene expression in endometrial cancer.

Alexandra Richey, Noel Kitchen, Craig M Rush, Jeffery M Vahrenkamp, Hosiana Abewe, Kyle S Osbourne, Alex J Bott, Brian K Dalley, Jared Rutter, Jason Gertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexandra RicheyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1297-8006
Noel KitchenHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4509-3861
Craig M RushHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1036-6909
Jeffery M VahrenkampHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-1513
Hosiana AbeweHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-1177
Kyle S OsbourneHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9654-7040
Alex J BottDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-8922
Brian K DalleyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9774-5200
Jared RutterDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-9765
Jason GertzHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA; jay.gertz@hci.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-6789

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Mechanisms of tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancer riskR21CA270580 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERTZ, JASON · 2023 to 2024
$387k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS R21 CA270580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1, also known as estrogen receptor alpha or ER) is an established oncogenic transcription factor in breast and endometrial cancer; however, more is known about the mechanisms controlling ER behavior in breast cancer, and therapies targeting ER have been much more successful in breast cancer. To address this disparity, we characterize the genomic features that control ER in endometrial cancer and determine to what extent these factors differ from those in breast cancer. We focus on the locations of estrogen response elements (EREs), ER's preferred DNA-binding motif, throughout the human genome. To identify factors that predict ER genomic binding and effects on target gene expression, we apply machine learning to genomic data for each ERE in Ishikawa cells (ER-positive endometrial cancer) and T-47D cells (ER-positive breast cancer). Many of these factors, such as chromatin accessibility and histone modifications, are predictive of ER activity in both cell lines. However, the transcription factors that predict ER activity are cell type specific, including FOXA1 and GATA3 in T-47D cells and ETV4 and SOX17 in Ishikawa cells. In addition, the features that predict ER binding and effects on gene expression differ, with transcription at EREs in the absence of estrogen being predictive of ER regulatory activity. A CRISPR knockout screen in Ishikawa cells, as well as follow-up experiments, confirms the discovery that SOX17 controls ER activity in endometrial cancer cells. These results identify important genomic features of ER binding and regulatory activity and how these features differ between endometrial cancer and breast cancer cells.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorGenome, HumanGenomicsHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaHumansMachine LearningProtein BindingResponse ElementsESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaFOXA1 protein, humanGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha

Identifiers

PMID42469015
PMCPMC13534285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.