ArticleGenome research2026
Identification of genomic features that uniquely impact estrogen receptor alpha binding and its effects on gene expression in endometrial cancer.
Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A network toxicology and machine learning approach to uncover the molecular machinery of bisphenol A-induced colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1, also known as estrogen receptor alpha or ER) is an established oncogenic transcription factor in breast and endometrial cancer; however, more is known about the mechanisms controlling ER behavior in breast cancer, and therapies targeting ER have been much more successful in breast cancer. To address this disparity, we characterize the genomic features that control ER in endometrial cancer and determine to what extent these factors differ from those in breast cancer. We focus on the locations of estrogen response elements (EREs), ER's preferred DNA-binding motif, throughout the human genome. To identify factors that predict ER genomic binding and effects on target gene expression, we apply machine learning to genomic data for each ERE in Ishikawa cells (ER-positive endometrial cancer) and T-47D cells (ER-positive breast cancer). Many of these factors, such as chromatin accessibility and histone modifications, are predictive of ER activity in both cell lines. However, the transcription factors that predict ER activity are cell type specific, including FOXA1 and GATA3 in T-47D cells and ETV4 and SOX17 in Ishikawa cells. In addition, the features that predict ER binding and effects on gene expression differ, with transcription at EREs in the absence of estrogen being predictive of ER regulatory activity. A CRISPR knockout screen in Ishikawa cells, as well as follow-up experiments, confirms the discovery that SOX17 controls ER activity in endometrial cancer cells. These results identify important genomic features of ER binding and regulatory activity and how these features differ between endometrial cancer and breast cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.