Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42468982›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

Embedding human factors and systems thinking in patient safety education: the Contributing factors, Analysis, and Recommendation Education (CARE) Tool.

Erika Petersen, Sanjeef Thampinathan, Joseph A Cafazzo, Laura D Pozzobon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika PetersenQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjeef ThampinathanQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph A CafazzoQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Laura D PozzobonQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada laura.pozzobon@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-8872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the recognised need, there remains a deficit of professionals skilled in the application of human factors theory and methods in patient safety incident reviews in healthcare. Addressing this gap by embedding human factors theory into quality and safety education is needed to develop professional who can drive sustainable and meaningful patient safety improvement.

objectiveDevelop an educational tool to support graduate students in developing knowledge and skills in the practical application of human factors frameworks to real-world patient safety challenges.

methodsThe tool was iteratively developed and used within a graduate-level human factors course using case-based learning to facilitate a theory-to-practice application.

resultWe developed the

conclusionThe CARE Tool was designed to facilitate practical understanding of human factors principles. Importantly, the CARE Tool contributes to addressing the need to develop professionals who can embed systems thinking into patient safety incident review methods. Beyond the classroom, the tool may be used by those analysing incidents in healthcare settings and/or developing mitigations.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsPatient SafetySystems AnalysisHumansEducationHuman factorsPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42468982
PMCPMC13384150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.