Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42468964›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Evaluating cannabis-nicotine substitution and demand during nicotine cessation treatment in young adults: protocol for a prospective, remote 12-week nicotine cessation trial in the USA.

Ashley N Dowd, Nathaniel L Baker, Mikhail N Koffarnus, Bethany R Raiff, Rachel L Tomko, Kevin M Gray, Erin A McClure

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06239350 (The Impact of Cannabis and Tobacco/Nicotine Product Co-use in Young Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06239350 narecruitingnot on this map

The Impact of Cannabis and Tobacco/Nicotine Product Co-use in Young Adults: Prospective Cessation Evaluation and Substitution

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2024 to 2028Enrolled350ConditionsTobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine DependenceArmsCounseling, Contingency management, Text-based support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley N DowdMedical University of South Carolina Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina, USA dowdas@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-0012
Nathaniel L BakerMedical University of South Carolina Department of Public Health Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Mikhail N KoffarnusUniversity of Kentucky Department of Family and Community Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-7734
Bethany R RaiffDepartment of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.
Rachel L TomkoMedical University of South Carolina Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Kevin M GrayMedical University of South Carolina Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Erin A McClureMedical University of South Carolina Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
AppalTRuST Project 3: Impact of proposed tobacco product rules in Appalachia on consumption and product switching with the Experimental Tobacco MarketplaceU54DA058256 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Mikhail Nikolaas Koffarnus · 2023 to 2026
$19.2M
HUMAN BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSET32DA007209 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Eric C. Strain, Elise M Weerts · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
The impact of cannabis and tobacco/nicotine product co-use in young adults: Prospective cessation evaluation and substitutionR01CA276066 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Erin A McClure · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276066NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007209NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA058256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe co-use of nicotine/tobacco products and cannabis among young adults is prevalent, yet little is known regarding the treatment impact of co-use and the underlying relationship between substances. No prospective treatment studies to date have evaluated the impact of cannabis use on nicotine cessation specifically among young adults, with an emphasis on dual-use substance patterns predicting outcomes. The overall goal of this protocol is to characterise the relationship between nicotine and cannabis and evaluate how patterns of co-use are associated with nicotine cessation outcomes through a behavioural economics framework to examine how cannabis co-use may be associated with nicotine cessation. This study protocol describes an ongoing, prospective nicotine cessation trial being conducted among young adults who co-use nicotine (vaping and/or cigarettes) and cannabis products to: (1) evaluate the association between behavioural economically derived measures of substance substitutability on end of treatment (EOT) nicotine abstinence, (2) examine whether changes in nicotine use are associated with changes in cannabis demand and use and (3) assess reciprocal prospective relationships between patterns of nicotine and cannabis use during treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a fully remote, prospective, 12-week nicotine cessation trial among young adults (ages 18-25; target N=350) across the USA who co-use nicotine and cannabis. Eligible participants vape nicotine and/or smoke cigarettes regularly (20+ days in the past 30) and use cannabis on 10+ out of the past 30 days. Participants receive comprehensive nicotine cessation treatment, which includes digital contingency management to reinforce nicotine abstinence, brief counselling and SMS-text based cessation support whereas cannabis use is monitored but not treated. Biochemical verification (through oral fluid samples) and self-reports (mobile daily diaries) of substance use are collected longitudinally. Study enrolment began in May 2024 and is expected to conclude in September 2027.Aim 1 (primary outcome) analyses will evaluate whether baseline behavioural economic indices of nicotine-cannabis substitutability predict EOT nicotine abstinence using logistic regression models. Aim 2 (exploratory outcome) analyses will use generalised linear mixed-effects models to examine within-person associations between changes in nicotine use (abstinence, reduction in use, nicotine withdrawal) and cannabis demand and use over time, and whether these associations are moderated by time-varying substitutability. Cross-lagged panel models will be used for Aim 3 (exploratory outcome) to assess reciprocal prospective relationships between nicotine and cannabis use during treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received Institutional Review Board approval from the Medical University of South Carolina (reference ID: Pro00131124). All participants provide informed consent prior to study procedures. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and data sharing in accordance with National Institutes of Health and institutional guidelines. The manuscript reports protocol components according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06239350.

Indexed as

Marijuana SmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use CessationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleNicotineNicotine Replacement TherapyProspective StudiesResearch DesignTobacco Use DisorderUnited StatesVapingYoung AdultNicotineClinical ProtocolsLongitudinal studiesProspective studiesPUBLIC HEALTHResearch DesignTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID42468964
PMCPMC13384142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.