ArticleBMJ open2026
Local innovations and systemic barriers in stunting reduction: a qualitative analysis of food and social assistance programmes in Indonesia.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReducing stunting remains a pressing global challenge, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where nutrition insecurity and limited access to health services persist. With its large-scale national social assistance and health programmes, Indonesia offers valuable insights into implementing integrated strategies for stunting prevention. This study examines the substantive elements of food and social assistance interventions as well as the contextual and structural factors that influence their implementation. It also assesses how multisectoral collaboration contributes to the implementation process of nutrition-specific efforts aimed at reducing stunting.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative case study in two districts of West Java Province, representing contrasting urban and rural contexts. Data were collected through 78 in-depth interviews with policymakers, implementers and primary beneficiaries. The policy implementation framework developed by Edward was used as a guide for the thematic analysis.
resultsWe identified key factors influencing programme delivery, including communication, resource availability, commitment of implementers and bureaucratic structure. Urban settings demonstrated better outreach, service utilisation and intersectoral coordination while rural areas faced logistical and administrative barriers. Innovative local practices, such as digital health monitoring and women's farmer groups helped bridge implementation gaps. However, structural constraints, such as inflexible eligibility criteria, poor data integration and fiscal dependency on the central government, limited the programme's reach.
conclusionIndonesia's experience demonstrates that effective stunting reduction requires national policy frameworks and locally adapted, multisectoral approaches that address system-level barriers. The practical lessons from this study can empower LMICs aiming to scale up integrated nutrition, health and social protection programmes, equipping them with the necessary knowledge and insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.