ArticleBMJ open2026
Multicentre prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial on the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive SAIF vertebral reconstruction technique versus spinal fixation in unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07071870 (A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive SAIF Vertebral Reconstruction Technique Versus Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive SAIF Vertebral Reconstruction Technique Versus Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOsteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) significantly impact morbidity, mortality, function and quality of life. Stable fractures with controllable pain can be managed conservatively. Those that remain painful can be treated with minimally invasive measures of vertebral augmentation (VA). In contrast, severe and unstable OVFs risk collapse, progressive kyphosis and neurological damage. Conventional VA is considered insufficient for these unstable fractures, making surgical stabilisation necessary to restore spinal load-bearing capacity, and allow fast and painless mobilisation. However, spinal surgery in elderly osteoporotic patients is challenging due to tissue fragility and common comorbidities. In addition, poor bone quality increases the risk of surgical implant failure, new fractures, complications and re-intervention.This trial aims to assess the non-inferiority of a novel minimally invasive interventional technique, called stent-screw assisted internal fixation (SAIF), compared with multilevel surgical stabilisation in terms of quality of life and radiological outcomes such as vertebral height restoration and kyphotic correction in patients with unstable OVFs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial that will be conducted in four European centres.A total of 140 patients with type Osteoporotic Fracture (OF) 3-5 OVFs (according to the AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System) will be randomised 1:1 to receive either SAIF intervention or surgical stabilisation.The primary outcome is to determine whether the effect of SAIF intervention is not inferior to surgical stabilisation on pain and quality of life at 1-year follow-up.The principal secondary outcomes are to evaluate whether the effect of the SAIF intervention is not inferior to surgical stabilisation in terms of radiological outcome and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Canton Ticino, Switzerland (CE 4004). Results will be disseminated through international publications in peer-reviewed journals, in addition to international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07071870.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.