Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42468943›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026

A Practical, Noninvasive Urine Collection Method for Mice for Large Cohort Preclinical Studies.

Neslihan Sarigul, Avery Antes, John Lukens, Erik Pearson, Daniela Olivera Velarde, Bulent Aydogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neslihan Sarigul1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Avery Antes1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
John Lukens1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Erik Pearson1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Daniela Olivera Velarde1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Bulent Aydogan1Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate urine collection is essential for preclinical studies involving metabolism, toxicology, and disease modeling. However, conventional methods such as metabolic caging and manual restraint are often invasive, labor intensive, prone to contamination, and not scalable for large cohorts, while also raising animal welfare concerns. This study presents a noninvasive and practical technique for collecting spot urine samples from healthy and tumor-bearing mice developed as a refinement to existing collection approaches. The method involves positioning the mouse in a natural voiding posture by allowing the hindlimbs to hang freely while the forelimbs grip a wire bar feeder, thereby stabilizing the animal and reducing excessive movement. Gentle abdominal pressure is applied only when needed. The method was validated in 80 C3H/HeJ and athymic nude mice, including both healthy and tumor-bearing (fibrosarcoma or prostate cancer [PC3]) models. Using this approach, spot urine volumes ranging from 13 to 200 µL were reliably collected from all mice, with each successful collection completed within 1 minute. Urine was successfully collected on the first attempt in ∼70% of cases. The mean urine yield was 51.7 ± 38.9 µL for healthy females, 53.7 ± 28.5 µL for healthy males, 50.8 ± 20.2 µL for tumor-bearing females, and 52.2 ± 28.1 µL for tumor-bearing males, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in urine volume distributions between groups. No visible fecal or particulate contamination was observed during sample collection. The collected volumes are sufficient for a wide range of molecular and metabolic analyses, ensuring the method's applicability in diverse research settings. Unlike other techniques that involve excessive handling, this method requires no restraint devices, making it well suited for large cohort studies and repeated sampling. The proposed technique represents a practical refinement in preclinical research by offering an optimal balance between sample quality, animal welfare, and experimental efficiency.

Indexed as

C3H/HeJ, C3H/HeJ mouse strainFSa, fibrosarcomaIACUC, Institutional Animal Care and Use CommitteePC3, prostate cancer cell lineSD, standard deviationμL, microliter

Identifiers

PMID42468943
PMCPMC13641247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.