ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Characterizing the Influence of Filter Substrates on Raman Measurements of Microplastics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool for the characterization of microplastics in environmental samples; however, measurements are typically performed directly on filter substrates, making substrate selection a critical factor for reliable identification. Here, we systematically investigate the influence of 18 commonly used filter substrates on Raman-based microplastic analysis using polystyrene particles with diameters of 7 and 1 μm as model systems. By combining confocal Raman microscopy, spatial Raman mapping, substrate background correction, and PCA-SVM-based classification, we demonstrate that substrate suitability is governed primarily by the geometric relationship between particle size and the confocal sampling volume. For particles substantially larger than the confocal point spread function, Raman spectra are sample-dominated and can be reliably acquired on a wide range of substrates, including polymeric membranes. At particle sizes approaching the confocal sampling volume, substrate contributions become unavoidable; however, mapping-based localization and local background subtraction enable reliable recovery of microplastic spectra even on chemically interfering polymeric filters. These findings challenge the common assumption that only nominally Raman-silent substrates are suitable and provide a practical, physically grounded framework for cost-efficient and flexible filter selection in Raman-based microplastic analysis. Furthermore, this work provides a practical substrate-selection guide for confocal Raman microspectroscopy across different sample types measured on supporting substrates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.