ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2026
Structural factors for receptor binding and activation of the Nociceptin opioid receptor by full and partial agonists.
Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small-molecule ligands for the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) opioid peptide receptor (NOP) from the 1-(piperidin-4-yl)indolin-2-one chemical scaffold has yielded several selective NOP full or partial agonists and NOP antagonists, as well as bifunctional agonists targeting the NOP and mu opioid (MOP) receptor. We report herein further lead optimization efforts around this scaffold to design new NOP partial agonists. Our previous structure-activity relationship studies in this series showed that ligands containing lipophilic alicyclic or aromatic substituents directly attached to the piperidine nitrogen induced NOP receptor states associated with full or partial agonism, whereas linking the same lipophilic moieties via a methylene linker to the piperidine nitrogen resulted in ligands that induced inactive NOP receptor states (NOP antagonists). Polar amino acid residues in NOP receptor extracellular loop 2 (EL2) and a hydrogen-bond network between EL2, transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) and TM1 residues have been proposed to play role in ligand-driven activation of this G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) but has not been explored for this chemical scaffold. Here we report ligand-based and structure-based discovery and structure activity relationship (SAR) of new 3-unsubstituted indolin-2-ones, indoline-2,3-diones and 3-(hydroxyimino)indolin-2-ones and identify key interactions at the NOP receptor that influence binding affinity and intrinsic activity. Our SAR and lead optimization introducing polar substituents at the 3-position of the indolinone series led to potent NOP partial agonism, in both NOP-selective and bifunctional NOP/MOP indolinone ligands such as the 3-(hydroxyimino)indolin-2-ones 1d (AT-127), 2c and 3c, which have potencies comparable to recently reported NOP partial agonists under clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.