Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42468320›Full record

ArticleJournal of optometry2026

Variations of axial eye shortening in response to positive defocus over the day.

Lea Ingrassia, Frank Schaeffel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of optometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lea IngrassiaInstitute for Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Switzerland. Electronic address: lea.ingrassia@iob.ch.
Frank SchaeffelInstitute for Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Switzerland; Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Germany; Zeiss Vision Science Lab, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: frank.schaeffel@uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShort-term visually induced axial eye shortening and choroidal thickening are of interest since they may be linked to reduced myopia development. We studied whether axial eye shortening, induced by imposing positive defocus, varies throughout the day, and whether emmetropes and myopes differ in their responses.

methodsTwenty young adults (10 emmetropes, 10 myopes) completed a daytime protocol conducted between 10:00 am and 3:00 pm, consisting of repeated 30- minute sessions of movie watching while the right eye was myopically defocused by a trial lens, imposing approximately +3D of myopic defocus at the viewing distance used. Each session was started and was followed by a washout period of 15 min. Axial length was measured in both eyes using the Lenstar LS900 biometer immediately before and after each session at five time points.

resultsEmmetropic eyes showed significant axial length shortening in response to imposed myopic defocus in the morning (10 am: -10.1 ± 7.8 µm, p = 0.0028, 11 am: -9.8 ± 7.0 µm, p = 0.0017) and again in the afternoon (3 pm: -11.2 ± 5.2 µm, p = 0.0001). No significant responses were observed at 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm. Different from emmetropes, myopic eyes did not exhibit significant axial length changes at any time point.

conclusionsEmmetropic eyes exhibited time-of-day-dependent variability in short-term axial length responses to myopic defocus, with stronger responses in the morning and afternoon but no responses around midday. The mechanisms underlying choroidal thickening appear to be modulated over the day. Myopic eyes showed minimal or no responses to positive defocus.

Indexed as

Axial lengthEmmetropizationMyopiaOptical defocusTime-of-day effects

Identifiers

PMID42468320
PMCPMC13400265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.