ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Evaluation of online cancer information for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: a systematic environmental scan.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience greater cancer incidence rates, unmet information needs, and poorer cancer outcomes compared to the general Australian population. This environmental scan evaluated cancer websites for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia.
methodsAn environmental scan using 8 Google searches was conducted in July 2025 to identify cancer-related websites targeted toward Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. Patient-facing resources were assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability using grade level assessments of readability and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Cultural relevance was assessed using an Aboriginal cultural relevance measure.
resultsOf 239 search results, 12 websites were patient facing and contained material for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers, primarily on common cancers. Readability generally exceeded the recommended Grade 6 reading level, with only one resource below Grade 6 level. Resources were considered understandable with scores of >80% for 7/12 websites (range 50-100%); 2/12 included summaries and 7/12 plain language. Actionability scores ranged from 0% to 100% (M = 63.6%, SD = 37.0), with wide variation. Cultural relevance averaged 3.8/7 (SD = 1.9) with only one resource meeting all criteria (7/7). Most lacked cultural specificity and did not provide Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages translations.
conclusionOur results necessitate co-design with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples for resources appropriate to community needs and including information on a broad range of cancers. Websites should optimize the readability and cultural safety of information for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples seeking cancer information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.