ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: redefining the limits of curative-intent therapy.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation segmentectomy (RS) utilizing Yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres has emerged as a highly effective, minimally invasive locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in early-stage disease. This precision treatment delivers ablative radiation doses directly to the tumor and its immediate surrounding parenchyma, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity and preserving healthy liver tissue. RS consistently demonstrates high objective and complete response rates, which often correlate directly with complete pathological necrosis of the tumor, as rigorously assessed by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. This robust imaging response translates into durable local tumor control and prolonged time to disease progression. The safety and feasibility of RS are generally well established. The procedure is typically well tolerated, with common adverse events usually being mild and transient. Severe complications are rare, emphasizing the procedure's precision and minimal invasiveness. Optimal outcomes are contingent upon meticulous patient selection, strict adherence to technical guidelines, and precise dosimetry. Beyond its role as a definitive therapy, RS plays a critical function in bridging and downstaging patients awaiting liver transplantation. By effectively controlling tumor burden, it enhances patient eligibility for transplantation and improves outcomes on transplant waiting lists. Furthermore, RS offers distinct advantages over other conventional locoregional therapies in specific clinical scenarios, solidifying its integral position within the comprehensive management paradigm for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.