ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Hydrogen Carrier Gas Method Translation in Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography for Sustainable Nontargeted Analysis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selection and control of carrier gas are critical factors influencing the performance of both one-dimensional gas chromatography (1D GC) and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC). Helium is widely used due to its inertness, but increasing cost, limited supply, and reliance on fossil fuel extraction raise sustainability concerns. Hydrogen offers a viable alternative, with faster optimal linear velocity to reach comparable efficiency, and more sustainable production through generators relying on water electrolysis. While tools exist to translate 1D GC methods from helium to hydrogen, their application to GC×GC has not been well established, particularly for parameters unique to multidimensional separations. This work presents the translation of helium to hydrogen carrier gas for cryogenically modulated GC×GC-MS. Three translated methods derived from 1D tools were evaluated alongside modulation period using standard mixtures, followed by validation with authentic fingermark residue samples in a forensic application. The translate option, using a combination of flow and temperature adjustments that matched column efficiency between helium and hydrogen, delivered comparable peak capacity, as well as acceptable S/N, tailing factors, and resolution values between key peak pairs. Modulation period could be reduced by 50%, providing a practical guideline for method translation. Hydrogen reduced overall run time by up to 60%, increasing sample throughput and lowering per-sample energy consumption. Although sustainability comparisons are nuanced, hydrogen showed improved green chemistry alignment overall, supported by higher sustainability metric scores and gains in efficiency and resource use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.