ArticlePloS one2026
Day-ahead active and reactive power scheduling of wind turbines and battery energy storage systems for power loss and CO2 emission reduction in AC microgrids.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a day-ahead scheduling framework to analyze and optimize the impact of the coordinated active and reactive power management of wind turbines (WTs) and battery energy storage systems (BESSs) on the energy losses and CO2 emissions of AC microgrids (MGs). Within this framework, the BESS plays a central role by absorbing surplus renewable generation, mitigating curtailment, supporting voltage regulation, and ensuring a stable and reliable dispatch over a 24-hour horizon. A population-based genetic algorithm (PGA) is proposed as the main solution methodology, while particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the multiverse optimizer (MVO) are employed as benchmark methods for comparison. To ensure a fair assessment, all optimization techniques are implemented under the same parallel processing scheme, using the same decision-variable encoding, feasibility correction procedure, and hourly sequential AC power-flow method. The objective is to minimize network energy losses and CO2 emissions under both grid-connected and islanded operating modes. The proposed methodology is validated on 33-node and 69-node MGs, both evaluated under variable demand and wind-generation scenarios to capture the uncertainty and temporal variability associated with renewable production and load behavior. In addition, the BESS model includes charging/discharging efficiency, self-discharge effects, and battery lifetime assessment under the proposed operating scenarios, allowing a more realistic representation of storage performance. The optimization methods are evaluated over 100 independent runs using the best solution, average solution, standard deviation, and computational time as performance indicators. The results show that the proposed PGA provides the most robust and repeatable performance, while also highlighting the operational contribution of the BESS, reducing renewable curtailment, and guaranteeing compliance with all technical constraints, under deterministic baseline operation and under uncertain time-varying operating conditions in both test systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.