ArticlePloS one2026
Research on incentive mechanisms for veterans' participation in grassroots governance: An analysis based on behavioral expectations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under the modernization of grassroots governance, veterans constitute a high-quality human resource for enhancing grassroots social governance capacity. Drawing on questionnaire survey data from 525 veterans in Guizhou Province, China, this study identifies three distinct veteran groups using latent class analysis (LCA): Utilitarian (51.3%), Mission-Oriented (23.8%), and Development-Focused (24.9%). Empirical results reveal clear heterogeneity in policy responsiveness and behavioral mechanisms across groups. First, the Utilitarian group responds most strongly to Subsidies, with participation behavior predominantly driven by economic rationality. Second, the Mission-Oriented group demonstrates honor-driven motivations, with symbolic recognition playing a central role in stimulating governance engagement. Third, the Development-Focused group prioritizes career advancement and exhibits significant responsiveness to promotion-related incentives. Based on these findings, this study constructs a mediation model of "Policy Instruments (PI)-Behavioral Expectations (BE)-Participation Behavior (PB)" and proposes an intervention pathway centered on "expectation diagnosis" and "instrument matching." By revealing the internal mechanism through which policy instruments (PI) influence participation behavior (PB) via Behavioral expectations (BE), this research provides empirical evidence and theoretical insights for shifting incentive strategies from "uniform provision" to "precision adaptation.".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.