Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467694›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Modification and validation of the InVEST erosion model for application at a national scale.

Danny A P Hooftman, Richard F Pywell, Paul M Evans, Cecily E D Goodwin, John W Redhead, Lucy E Ridding, Varun Varma, James M Bullock

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danny A P HooftmanLactuca, Environmental Data Analyses and Modelling, Diemen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-6897
Richard F PywellUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Paul M EvansUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-420X
Cecily E D GoodwinUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
John W RedheadUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Lucy E RiddingUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Varun VarmaRothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-6125
James M BullockUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil erosion is an important ecological impact of human activities such as agriculture, and models can aid in identifying areas most at risk. However, to aid targeting of actions, predictions must simultaneously cover large spatial extents and account for site-specific variation in retention, while achieving adequate parameterisation and evaluation of models remains demanding. To address these issues, we adapted and assessed an erosion model using the InVEST platform, which applies the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), for Great Britain (GB). We parametrised the model using GB-specific input data, for multiple crop types, and integrating new factors including sub-annual periodicity, a GB-specific erosivity layer, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived cover management metrics. Our modelled predictions validated well against sediment concentration measurements in rivers, with a predictive accuracy of 78% on normalised data and rank correlation of 0.46 between predictions and observations. However, absolute model values were overestimated by 28-times, especially at higher levels of sediment erosion. This seems related to a lack of measurements of sediment concentrations at peak flows in the validation data, combined with known RUSLE methodological issues. To allow for future model training, we call for improvements to national sediment load monitoring in rivers, by including measurements during peak flows especially, and inclusion of a within stream sedimentation function in the InVEST Sediment Delivery Ratio model. Our InVEST model parametrisation example provides a valuable tool for relative risk mapping, comparing regions and targeting where ecosystems are more prone to erosion. Cover management factors based on NDVI observations are a substantial methodological improvement for RUSLE modelling that can be readily reproduced in other locations. Whereas a sub-annual version did not lead to differences from an annual model in this all-year around rain area it could enhance modelling for more seasonal areas.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSoil ErosionAgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringGeologic SedimentsRiversSoilUnited KingdomSoil

Identifiers

PMID42467694
PMCPMC13379084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.