ArticlePloS one2026
Assessing unprofessional behaviors of dental students through multi-source feedback: A mixed methods analysis of engagement and influencing factors.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnprofessional behaviors have been identified as a hindrance to the professional identity formation of dental students. This study aimed to investigate dental students' engagement with unprofessional behavior in a clinical setting and to explore their experiences regarding the factors influencing this behavior in dental school.
methodsThe sequential mixed-methods study conducted at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. A total of 140 dental students participated, selected through a census method. The quantitative phase focused on evaluating unprofessional behaviors among students using Multi-Source Feedback (MSF), which included assessments from clinical teachers, nurses, and self-evaluations by the students. In the qualitative phase, participants were chosen through purposeful sampling, and their experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews.
resultsResponses from all three groups of clinical teachers, nurses, and students showed that the highest students' engagement with unprofessional behaviors was related to aspects of responsibility and respect. The highest engagement of unprofessional behavior was reported among junior learners (P = 0.0001) and male students (P = 0.0001). The students' experiences were classified into a theme "disturbance of individual and systemic factors in the development of professional behaviors," with two categories of "individualism" and "challenges of the overt and covert curriculum in professional development".
conclusionThe disruption of both individual and systemic factors has led to unprofessional behaviors at the dental school. On an individual level, issues such as a focus on profit and a reluctance to meet professional responsibilities have hindered adherence to principles of professionalism. At the systemic level, negative role models and inadequate educational requirements and training processes have also contributed to the prevalence of unprofessional behaviors among participants. Given generalizability limited to culturally similar educational contexts, other institutions may adopt MSF and targeted interventions on clinical role models and early responsibility training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.