ArticleThe Journal of urology2026
Diagnostic Test Characteristics of Renal Ultrasound Findings for High-Risk Bladder in Spina Bifida.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpina bifida (SB) can cause neurogenic bladder dysfunction and renal deterioration. Guidelines recommend renal ultrasound (RUS) for surveillance, but its utility in screening for high-risk bladder is unclear. We evaluated the performance of RUS findings for detecting high-risk bladder in youth with SB. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with myelomeningocele at a pediatric SB clinic who had a RUS within 3 months of urodynamics (UDS). RUS parameters included hydronephrosis, thinned parenchyma, hypoplasia, and scarring. High-risk bladder was defined as end-fill pressures/detrusor leak point pressures of 40 cm H
resultsWe analyzed 575 UDS-RUS dyads from 244 unique patients. Median age was 7.2 years, and 70% had ventricular shunts. Twenty-five percent of dyads had high-risk bladder. Any hydronephrosis by Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grading demonstrated an overall sensitivity 50%, specificity 57%, and clustered AUC of 55% for detecting high-risk bladder. RUS had similar performance across additional analyses, including nonambulatory patients, high-grade hydronephrosis (SFU 3-4), any RUS abnormality, and using Urinary Tract Dilation grading instead of SFU grading. Any hydronephrosis had higher test sensitivity for high-risk bladder in fuller bladders on RUS (RUS-bladder volume >75% of UDS-bladder capacity).
conclusionsRUS should not be used alone as a screening tool to identify high-risk bladder in youth with SB given its limited sensitivity and diagnostic utility. UDS remains an essential and necessary tool for surveilling at-risk bladders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.