Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality.

Zhihao Gao, Muhammad Waseem Bari, Sadia Shaheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhihao GaoSchool of Economics and Management, Quanzhou University of Information Engineering, Quanzhou, China.
Muhammad Waseem BariLyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-3857
Sadia ShaheenLyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper employs sensemaking theory to examine the relationships between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and the quality of decision-making in information technology firms. Additionally, this study operationalized sensemaking processes as a mediator in the above mentioned relationships. The study employed a three-time lag approach with a 45-day gap, utilizing data from 348 managers, supervisors, and leaders. Partial least squares structural equation modeling and SmartPLS 4 are employed for the analyses. The results indicate that rationalized knowledge-hiding and communication patterns have a significant impact on decision-making quality. Moreover, sensemaking processes partially/complementary mediate the relationship between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and decision-making quality. Incorporating sensemaking processes into the study model provides deeper insight into managers' decisions and maps the temporal nature of these relationships. These valuable findings shed light on new meanings and directions for theoretical perspectives and their relevance in management and organizational behavior.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingKnowledgeHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID42467665
PMCPMC13379005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.