Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467623›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Rabea Begum, Paul Parikh, David Walton, Alison Rushton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rabea BegumSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1352-0016
Paul ParikhSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
David WaltonSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Alison RushtonSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that contributes to significant global burden. Evidence on physical measures of functioning as prognostic factors for neck pain remains limited. The objective of this study is to investigate whether physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors predict outcomes for people with neck pain.

methodsThis protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study will recruit approximately 156 adults with neck pain of any duration. Physical measures of physical functioning including impairment, performance, and activity measures in a real environment, will be assessed as prognostic factors. Outcomes at 12-month follow-up will include pain, disability, and overall changes, assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Global Rating of Change (GROC), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses will be conducted separately for each physical measure and outcome. Physical measures will first be entered alone to examine the initial unadjusted (bivariate) association with the outcome, followed by adjustment for covariates (age, sex and baseline NPRS/NDI). Additional contribution will be evaluated using changes in explained variance ΔR2 and F-change statistics. Physical measures demonstrating additional contribution will subsequently be entered into the final penalized multivariable regression model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to reduce overfitting and identify the most relevant prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses comparing penalized and non-penalized multivariable regression models will also be conducted to examine the consistency and stability of the findings. Prognostic effects will be reported as beta coefficients (β) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each model will be internally validated using bootstrapping, with model performance evaluated using calibration and discrimination. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new insights into how physical measures of physical functioning relate to outcomes for neck pain. The resulting prognostic models have the potential to strengthen clinical decision-making, support personalized care, and guide the development of targeted interventions for people with neck pain. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol has prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The link is https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HG6PJ.

Indexed as

Neck PainAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePain MeasurementPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42467623
PMCPMC13379007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.