ReviewJournal of medical entomology2026
Canadian Arctic mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) through time: a review of historical records and challenges.
Review in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the occurrence of arthropods in the Arctic relies heavily on distributional and taxonomic evidence, yet substantial gaps and inconsistencies in available data complicate interpretation. These limitations impact our understanding of ecologically-and medically-important groups such as the mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae), whose Arctic diversity and biogeography remain poorly resolved. Many species were originally described from limited material, often using morphological traits that differ from those observed in more thoroughly studied southern populations. Sparse and uneven sampling across the Arctic limits our ability to accurately assess species distributions, and missing or incomplete metadata further diminishes the scientific value of existing specimens. Collectively, these issues obscure patterns of biodiversity, hinder detection of climate‑driven range shifts, and constrain efforts to evaluate the vector potential of species capable of transmitting arboviruses. As concerns grow regarding the northward expansion of mosquito‑borne pathogens, the absence of reliable baseline data poses a major challenge for assessing current and future risks to human and animal health in Arctic ecosystems. This review synthesizes historical records of Canadian Arctic mosquitoes from early natural history expeditions beginning around 1820 to the present. We evaluate the taxonomic reliability, geographic accuracy, and research relevance of these records to determine which can serve as credible baselines for contemporary biodiversity assessments. By clarifying the strengths and limitations of the historical dataset, this review aims to support improved species distribution modeling, inform future surveillance efforts, and guide research priorities in a rapidly changing Arctic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.