Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467449›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

State Medicaid Bed-Hold Policies and Hospitalizations and ED Visits Among Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents.

Hyunkyung Yun, Hye-Young Jung, Cyrus Kosar, Peter Hull, Mark Aaron Unruh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyunkyung YunDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Hye-Young JungDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Joan and Sanford I. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York.
Cyrus KosarDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Peter HullDepartment of Economics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Mark Aaron UnruhDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Joan and Sanford I. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Forty-three state Medicaid programs have bed-hold policies that reimburse nursing homes (NHs) to reserve a resident's bed during a hospitalization or other temporary absence. Although bed-hold policies are intended to increase continuity of care, some evidence suggests they may incentivize NHs to hospitalize residents; however, these data are outdated, and the impact of bed-hold policies on resident outcomes remains understudied. Objective: To examine the association between Medicaid bed-hold policies and hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among NH residents receiving long-term care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of long-stay NH residents in the US used claims data for a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2013 through 2018. Adjusted comparisons between states that did and did not adopt bed-hold policies were conducted using a staggered difference-in-differences design. Sensitivity analyses were conducted that (1) used composite outcomes combining death with hospitalization and ED visits, (2) restricted the sample to dually eligible residents, (3) excluded hospital-based NHs, (4) restricted the sample to NHs that were present for the entire study period, (5) restricted the sample to for-profit NHs, and (6) used alternate approaches to adjust standard errors. Data were analyzed between April and November 2025. Exposures: State adoption of a Medicaid bed-hold policy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations and ED visits in a given month were the 2 primary outcomes. Results: The sample included 219 719 long-stay NH residents (mean [SD] age, 80.2 [12.6] years; 67.2% female) in 22 states and the District of Columbia, of which 16 states adopted bed-hold policies. There were no significant changes in differences in resident and NH characteristics between those in states that did and did not adopt the policies from the pre- to the post-adoption period. Adjusted estimates did not show statistically significant changes in the likelihood of hospitalization (-0.1 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.1 pp; P = .41) or an ED visit (0.0 pp; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2 pp; P = .68) associated with adoption of bed-hold policies. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that states' adoption of Medicaid bed-hold policies was not associated with hospitalizations or ED visits among long-stay NH residents, suggesting that the goal of bed-hold policies may not be undermined by increases in these events.

Indexed as

Bed OccupancyContinuity of Patient CareHealth PolicyMedicaidNursing Home ResidentsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleNursing HomesState Government

Identifiers

PMID42467449
PMCPMC13379738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.