Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467430›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Prescribed Short-Acting Hormonal Contraceptive Use Among Premenopausal Females.

Israel Bacha, Suleepon Uttamapinan, Hannah Harsanyi, Abigail Liberty, Lin Yang, Adetunji T Toriola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Israel BachaDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Suleepon UttamapinanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Hannah HarsanyiDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abigail LibertyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Complex Family Planning, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Lin YangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Adetunji T ToriolaDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hormonal contraceptive use has important implications for both reproductive and general health. However, the patterns and trends of short-acting hormonal contraceptive use among US premenopausal females remain insufficiently characterized. Objective: To evaluate trends in and factors associated with prescribed short-acting hormonal contraceptive use among US premenopausal females. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial, cross-sectional analyses were conducted using US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including 10 survey cycles between 1999 to 2000 and 2017 to 2020 (before the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants included noninstitutionalized premenopausal females aged 15 years to younger than 60 years without a history of breast cancer. Data were analyzed from January to November 2025. Exposures: NHANES cycle. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of prescribed short-acting hormonal contraceptive use was extracted from the prescription medication data collected during household interviews. Data primarily reflect oral contraceptives and were categorized as combined estrogen and progestin or progestin-only formulations. Results: Data on 15 531 premenopausal females (14.7% aged 15 to <20 years, 59.3% aged 20 to <40 years, 26.1% aged 40 to <60 years) were analyzed. Participants predominantly had an educational level higher than high school (59.8%), were privately insured (59.3%), and never smoked (58.7%). From 1999 to 2020, the prevalence of prescribed short-acting hormonal contraceptive use significantly increased from 5.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-11.5%) to 15.1% (95% CI, 10.7%-20.7%) for females aged 15 to younger than 20 years, was stable for females aged 20 to younger than 40 years (16.7% [95% CI, 13.2%-21.0%] to 13.3% [95% CI, 10.7%-16.4%]), and remained low among those aged 40 to younger than 60 years (3.8% [95% CI, 1.5%-9.3%] to 7.0% [95% CI, 4.0%-12.1%]). Compared with non-Hispanic White females, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic females had lower prevalence of use and exhibited the greatest relative increases (prevalence ratio, 3.7 [95% CI, 1.0-13.7] among non-Hispanic Black females and 1.8 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7] among Hispanic females) from 1999 to 2020. Progestin-only formulations accounted for 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.5%) of the prescribed short-acting hormonal contraceptive prescriptions in 1999 to 2000 and remained low (5.2% [95% CI, 3.0%-8.9%)] in 2017-2020. The prevalence of short-acting hormonal contraceptive use varied by race and ethnicity in all age groups, by family income to poverty ratio, educational attainment, health insurance coverage, marital status, and weight status among females aged 20 to younger than 40 years and by family income to poverty ratio and smoking status among females aged 40 to younger than 60 years. Conclusions and Relevance: In this serial cross-sectional study of US premenopausal females, prescribed short-acting hormonal contraceptive use increased among females aged 15 to younger than 20 years and among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic females. Across all groups, the use of progestin-only formulations remained low over time.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, HormonalHormonal ContraceptionPremenopauseAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysUnited StatesYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID42467430
PMCPMC13379744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.