Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467397›Full record

ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2026

Not All Screen Use is Equal: Shifting the Focus from Screen Time to Problematic Use in Child and Adolescent Well-Being Research.

Katrine Bønneland Tølbøll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katrine Bønneland TølbøllDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. kbt@ps.au.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-3234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital media is an increasingly central part of children's and adolescents' lives, prompting growing concern among parents, educators, clinicians, and policymakers about its impact on cognitive, emotional, social, and physical well-being. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from 52 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, along with key individual studies, to assess the state of knowledge on youth digital media use. Findings show a clear pattern: problematic media use is consistently linked to adverse outcomes across domains, whereas general digital media use shows mixed effects shaped by content, motives, context, individual traits, and theoretical perspectives. The review highlights the need to move beyond simplistic screen time metrics toward dynamic, person-centered models that clarify mechanisms, identify at-risk children and adolescents, and guide targeted interventions and policy responses in families, schools, clinical practice, and digital platform governance.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBehavior, AddictiveChild BehaviorScreen TimeAdolescentChildDigital MediaHumansMedia ExposurePsychological Well-BeingAdolescentsBehavioural addictionsMental healthProblematic screen useScreens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.