ArticleEndocrine pathology2026
Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with high recurrence rates. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive, blood-based biomarker with multiple oncologic applications. The role of ctDNA in ACC care remains understudied. This retrospective, single-institution, study evaluated real-world use of ctDNA testing in patients with ACC and its correlation with imaging-based tumor burden. Patients with ACC (≥ 18 years) who underwent ctDNA testing via a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, Natera) during their disease course were reviewed, and clinical data were obtained from the medical records. ctDNA results were tested for association with disease status and tumor burden determined by concurrent imaging and clinical evaluation. Twenty patients (55% male) were included; the median age at first ctDNA assessment was 58.3 years (range, 23.3-81.1). A total of 87 ctDNA tests were analyzed (median, 4 tests/patient; interquartile range [IQR], 1-6). The median ctDNA level was 1.27 mean tumor molecules/mL (IQR, 0.05-22.86). Detected ctDNA was strongly associated with evidence of disease (odds ratio, 74; 95% confidence interval, 9-3438). The ctDNA assay demonstrated high sensitivity (88%), specificity (91.7%), and overall accuracy (88.5%), with a positive post-test probability of 98% and a negative post-test probability of 45%. In addition, ctDNA levels were positively correlated with tumor burden (Spearman R = 0.844; p < 0.001). These findings support the potential value of ctDNA testing for disease monitoring in ACC and it may support a more personalized approach to this rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.