Observational studyLasers in medical science2026
Dual-depth 25-pin insulated microneedle radiofrequency for moderate-to-severe periorbital wrinkles.
Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate efficacy and safety of dual-depth 25-pin insulated microneedle radiofrequency (RF) treatment for periorbital wrinkles and skin elasticity. This observational study included 32 adults aged 30-60 years with baseline Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment Scale (FWAS) scores of 4 or higher. Patients underwent three microneedle RF treatment sessions at 4-week intervals. The protocol employed a duty-controlled, dual-shot mechanism to sequentially deliver thermal energy to 1.5 mm and 1.0 mm depths within a single needle insertion. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and weeks 16 and 24 using blinded FWAS grading, Antera 3D imaging, Cutometer R2/R5/R7, patient satisfaction, and safety monitoring. The mean FWAS score decreased from 5.44 ± 0.80 at baseline to 3.38 ± 0.61 at week 24 (p < 0.001). Quantitative imaging revealed relevant reductions in average wrinkle depth, maximum wrinkle depth, and the indentation index, while R2, R5, and R7 increased throughout follow-up (all p < 0.001). At week 24, 90.63% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. The mean procedure time was 7.2 ± 1.4 min, and the mean pain score was 3.3 ± 0.9. Adverse events were limited to transient mild erythema and edema, resulting in an average downtime of 1.5 ± 0.5 days. The dual-depth, 25-pin insulated microneedle RF protocol demonstrated clinical utility and a favorable safety profile as a minimally invasive option for periorbital rejuvenation. By delivering targeted dermal thermal stimulation without repeated mechanical passes, the procedure improved wrinkle severity and skin elasticity with short treatment time and limited recovery burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.