Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467323›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026

Bipedality in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus griseipes) in Gorongosa National Park: a multi-contextual, socially-relevant and demographically-structured behavior.

K Chappell-Smith, D I Cavallaro, S Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K Chappell-SmithInstitute of Human Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kerrischappellsmith@gmail.com.
D I CavallaroSchool of Anthropology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8667-7330
S CarvalhoInstitute of Human Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-3720

Funding

Leverhulme Trust PLP-114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obligate bipedalism is a defining trait of the human lineage, yet the selective pressures underlying its emergence and fixation remain debated, particularly within the woodland-grassland mosaic environments associated with early hominins. Modern semi-terrestrial primates inhabiting comparable ecosystems provide a useful model for evaluating candidate functional contexts of early bipedal behavior in the human lineage. Here, we present the first systematic description of bipedal behavior in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus griseipes). Using all-occurrence sampling across two troops of baboons in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique, we recorded 231 bipedal bouts over 12 observation days. Bipedalism was predominantly postural and most frequently occurred in vigilance contexts. Several social contexts of bipedalism were recorded, including play, grooming, socio-sexual mounting, and attempted infant snatching. Arboreal bipedalism was rare and primarily linked to foraging. Rates and contexts of bipedalism varied across age-sex classes. Infants and juveniles exhibited higher bipedalism rates than other classes and expressed the broadest bipedal context repertoire. Vigilance was the only context prompting bipedalism across all age-sex classes. We discuss these patterns to evaluate how multi-contextual, socially-relevant and age- and sex-structured bipedalism behavior in baboons may inform reconstructions of early hominin bipedalism.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPapio ursinusSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleGroomingMaleMozambiqueParks, RecreationalAge-sex structuresBipedalismHuman evolutionPrimate modelsSociality

Identifiers

PMID42467323
PMCPMC13541862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.