ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Deep learning-based automated assessment of alveolar bone loss in CBCT for periodontitis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a CBCT-based automated system for assessing radiographic alveolar bone loss (RBL) to improve the accuracy and efficiency of periodontitis diagnosis.
methodsA total of 110 patients (2,796 teeth) with Stage I-IV periodontitis from four center were included. The nnU-Net framework was used to segment teeth, alveolar bone, and the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). RBL was calculated automatically using an edge-constrained shortest path algorithm. The model was trained on data from Center A and externally validated with datasets from Centers B-D. Linear periodontal measurements from 11 CBCT scans were compared between manual and CAD-based segmentation. An independent validation set was used to assess automated staging accuracy and time efficiency.
resultsThe CAD system achieved Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 95.85% for teeth, 95.75% for alveolar bone, and 86.18% for the CEJ. External validation showed alveolar bone and tooth DSC values both above 95% and CEJ DSC values above 77%. Linear measurements showed strong agreement with manual segmentation (Spearman's ρ = 0.9187; ICC = 0.9266). For staging, the CAD system reached an overall accuracy of 87.31%, with 97.01% for Stage Ⅰ, 88.06% for Stage Ⅱ and 89.55% for Stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ. The CAD system represented a 13.42-fold acceleration compared with the manual workflow.
conclusionThe CAD system enables accurate automated segmentation and RBL quantification on CBCT images, with robust multicenter performance and substantial gains in efficiency. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This system offers a fast and reliable method for RBL assessment, supporting consistent diagnosis and monitoring of periodontitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.