ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
From data to scent: validating an ensemble AI model that predicts novel insect odourant interactions.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextInsects navigate the world through odourant receptor (OR)-mediated chemo-sensation. While of primary importance, insect chemo-sensation is poorly understood due to the lack of experimental structures surveying the binding between ORs and their ligands. Computational approaches empowered by deep learning can, in principle, provide an accurate prediction of OR structures and an understanding of the key determinants shaping OR-ligand interaction. However, a comprehensive survey of these models' capabilities is missing.
methodsHere, we evaluate the ability of different models to predict OR structures and their binding. We found that while AlphaFold2 and Boltz2 can accurately predict the structure and pose of insect ORs, existing deep learning models struggle to accurately predict ligand binding affinity and differentiate between binders and nonbinders: with high prediction variability even between very similar targets. To increase accuracy and ameliorate the identified limitations, we tested a weighted combination of models, demonstrating a meta-model with improved accuracy. We show that, when applied to the prediction of naphthalene binding, this approach can efficiently predict binding affinities to a series of highly responsive ORs, with empirical validation of the computational predictions. These results not only demonstrate the opportunity for meta-models to increase accuracy of insect OR prediction but provide insights on the generalised prediction of membrane protein complexes and ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.