Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467268›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

A novel writing to dictation test to investigate lexical and sublexical processes: Italian normative data and preliminary clinical feasibility in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Beatrice Feder, Giulia Polli, Susanna Laurenzi, Serena Righetti, Barbara Tessari, Stefano Terruzzi, Costanza Papagno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatrice FederCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy.
Giulia PolliCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy.
Susanna LaurenziDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, 20126, Italy.
Serena RighettiCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy.
Barbara TessariCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy.
Stefano TerruzziCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy.
Costanza PapagnoCenter for Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (CeRiN), Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento-via Matteo Del Ben, 5/b, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy. costanza.papagno@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-6294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Writing abilities can be interpreted within dual-route models, which distinguish lexical and sublexical processes. The present study aimed to validate a novel writing to dictation test to assess both lexical and sub-lexical spelling abilities in an Italian population. A sample of 392 healthy participants provided robust normative data, revealing significant effects of age, education, and sex on spelling performance. Test-retest analyses indicated satisfactory reliability and minimal learning effects. The clinical feasibility of the test was explored in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). MCI patients mainly showed selective difficulties in spelling words with unpredictable orthography, suggesting early lexical impairment, whereas AD patients exhibited more severe and heterogeneous deficits involving both lexical and sublexical processes. Qualitative error analysis revealed multiple dysgraphic patterns, particularly in the AD group. Spelling performance did not significantly correlate with other cognitive domains, which may suggest a relative specificity of writing impairment. While the test provides a useful tool for assessing spelling abilities and characterizing writing to dictation disorders in neurodegenerative conditions, limitations related to sample stratification and socio-demographic representation were noted. The study underscores the importance of including standardized writing to dictation assessments in neuropsychological evaluations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionNeuropsychological TestsWritingAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsAlzheimer’s Disease (AD)Lexical and sub-lexical processingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Neuropsychological evaluationSpelling assessment

Identifiers

PMID42467268
PMCPMC13379433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.