ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
The Effectiveness and Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness of Regular Meditation for Improving Quality of Life: Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, millions of people globally have taken up Buddhist spiritual and secularized meditation practices, such as mindfulness, with the aim of improving their quality of life and well-being. Practitioners are recommended to continue meditating regularly for the long term; however, the effects of regular meditation practice after introductory instruction remain scientifically underexplored. Objective: This protocol aims to investigate whether regular meditation practice improves quality of life and mental well-being and whether its effects vary between secular and spiritual practitioners. We will also explore the cost-effectiveness of meditation in terms of quality of life and the incidence and functional impact of any adverse effects associated with the practice. Methods: We will conduct a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 600 beginner meditators in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom over a 1-year period. Meditation practice frequency and duration will be reported weekly through the ambulatory assessment app Fabla (Emory University), with sampling of the primary outcome of quality of life and secondary outcome of mental well-being at monthly intervals. Practice characteristics, including secular versus spiritual practice, will also be reported monthly, as will the costs of meditation and mental health care and the incidence, severity, and duration of any adverse effects. Potential confounders, including baseline mental health symptoms, social support, and sociodemographics, will be controlled for in linear mixed models. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted. Results: Data collection began on October 28, 2025, after this study was first submitted on October 1, 2025. As of May 14, 2026, 341 participants have completed baseline measures. We expect results to be published in January 2028. Conclusions: Results of this investigation will illuminate the impact of meditation as it is currently practiced in natural contexts, and inform clinicians about whether and how regular meditation may be an effective tool for improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.