Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467235›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Improved DNA extraction from marine bones: A 15-year retrospective evaluation using an adapted Dabney extraction method.

Nina Schwemer, Sophie Fertyk, Jan Euteneuer, Johanna Preuß-Wössner, Maria Seidel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina SchwemerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Sophie FertykInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Nord-Rhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Jan EuteneuerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Johanna Preuß-WössnerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Maria SeidelInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. maria.seidel@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-3378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracting DNA for the purpose of identification from bone material, especially for old samples or from extreme environmental conditions, has always been a challenging task in forensic genetics. At our forensic institute with two locations between the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, found marine bones are regularly submitted for evaluation and analyzed using molecular biology methods.

methodsAn improvement to commercially available bead-based methods routinely used for the bone investigations and often yielding poor or no DNA, was therefore aimed for. In the present study, an overview of all marine bones analyzed from the years 2009-2024 was conducted and samples - if possible - reanalyzed with a newly introduced adapted extraction method according to Dabney.

resultsA total of 82 bone finds have been examined over the last 15 years, 18 of which (22%) could eventually be re-examined using the adapted Dabney method. Morphologically, 61% of the bone finds were long tubular bones, followed by skulls and mandibular bones with both 13%. Compared to the North Sea bones, the Baltic Sea bones were better preserved on the outside, but showed increased adhesions of algae and barnacles. A comparison with the previously obtained molecular analysis results showed for the majority of the reanalyzed bones significantly higher DNA concentrations up to a 98-fold increase, enabling DNA profiling with an overall better quality (41% complete profiles compared to 12%).

conclusionThe reanalysis demonstrated that the adapted Dabney method extracts DNA from marine bones more effectively, and thus offers a superior alternative to a commonly used forensic extraction method.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesDNADNA FingerprintingAnimalsHumansNorth SeaPolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesDNAAncient DNADegraded DNAMarine bonesSilica membrane

Identifiers

PMID42467235
PMCPMC13658333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.