ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Retinopathy of prematurity screening and treatment practice patterns: an African multi-country survey.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond gestational age and birth weight: the importance of risk-adapted ROP screening in African settings.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess current retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and treatment practices among healthcare professionals across Africa.
methodsAn online in-depth survey consisting primarily of multiple-choice questions was sent to ophthalmologists and healthcare professionals involved in ROP care across Africa via professional networks, social media and word-of-mouth recommendations.
resultsA total of 62 respondents from 16 countries were included. ROP was considered a current or emerging public health problem by 95.2% of respondents. Although 91.9% of respondents reported having a neonatal intensive care unit in their facility or nearby, 51.6% indicated the absence of a formal referral pathway between neonatal and ophthalmology services. Anti-VEGF and laser photocoagulation were available for 90.3% and 56.5% of respondents, respectively. ROP screening criteria and treatment approaches were heterogeneous, with anti-VEGF therapy frequently being used as a first-line across all disease stages. Vitreoretinal services were located more than 200 km away or outside the country for 31.6% of respondents. The most frequently reported barriers to care were cost, lack of trained personnel, and limited integration between neonatal and ophthalmic services. Notably, 95.2% expressed interest in further training or participation in a regional ROP network.
conclusionROP practice patterns across Africa remain heterogeneous and are constrained, in many settings, by limited access to laser photocoagulation, inadequate integration with neonatal services, and gaps in formal training. The widespread use of anti-VEGF as first-line therapy across all stages of disease raises concern in settings where loss to follow-up is common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.