ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Investing in surveillance and community engagement to improve HPV immunization provision: An innovation in enabling evidence-based public health practice.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingCanadian public health organizations across multiple provinces.
interventionThe intervention is a funding initiative by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the Urban Public Health Network to improve Human papillomavirus immunization by enabling exploration activities by local organizations to leverage data-driven surveillance and community engagement. These activities included quantitative analysis of immunization data linked to sociodemographic indicators and qualitative engagement involving interviews, focus groups, and participatory surveillance with providers and community members. The objective of this multi-site intervention is to demonstrate the value of utilizing mixed forms of surveillance data to improve public health practice using principles of "learning systems." OUTCOMES: Mixed-methods surveillance identified geographic and demographic gaps, barriers with regard to HPV immunization coverage including language, trust, and systemic inequities. Exploration activities revealed significant disparities in HPV immunization coverage across regions and populations. Barriers included language and literacy challenges, mistrust of health systems, systemic racism, and logistical issues such as consent processes. Case examples from Vancouver Coastal Health, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Métis Nation BC, and others demonstrated how tailored strategies emerged from these insights. Quantitative findings highlighted sociodemographic predictors of under-immunization, while qualitative data underscored cultural and contextual factors influencing vaccine uptake. IMPLICATIONS: This multi-site, multi-method approach provided actionable intelligence for local public health organizations to adapt HPV immunization programs. Lessons learned include the need for flexible funding models and capacity-building for epidemiological analysis. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly influenced implementation timelines and resource allocation, underscoring the importance of resilience in public health systems. Limitations include variability in data infrastructure and challenges in harmonizing approaches across jurisdictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.