ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
In-depth tube assessment by ultrasound: double twist sign to evaluate endotracheal tube depth-results of a cadaver diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAn adequate endotracheal tube depth is crucial for airway management and effective mechanical ventilation, as both too deep and superficial tube placement can be harmful to the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate endotracheal tube depth using the ultrasound double twist sign as a new diagnostic tool using a cadaver model.
methodsIn this diagnostic accuracy study, ultrasounds were performed by 12 sonographers (2 expert and 10 novice users, consisting of residents and specialists) on 3 cadavers. Novice users learned the technique in 15 min. Tubes were randomized to be placed in adequate, deep (tube tip touching main carina) or superficial (cranial edge of cuff touching vocal cords) position.
resultsThe double twist sign showed an overall success rate of 90.6% to identify tube depth. It was particular reliable in identifying and ruling out deep placement, with a sensitivity of 99.2%, a specificity of 98.5%. The mean time to identify deep placement was 6.4 s; with an overall mean assessment time of 18.4 s. Test performance was not significantly impacted by cadaver (BMI, neck circumference) or sonographer characteristics ( sonographer experience); however, the study was not powered to exclude clinically meaningful effects of anatomy.
conclusionIn an embalmed cadaver model, the double twist sign enabled rapid and accurate assessment of endotracheal tube depth using POCUS( Point of care ultrasound)with an air-filled cuff. These findings support feasibility and diagnostic potential, but clinical performance in ventilated patients and comparison against radiography require prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.