ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
A Socioecological Perspective on Sexual Health Promotion Choices Among Youth At-Risk for and Living with HIV in Los Angeles and New Orleans.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth in the US remain at high relative risk for HIV and sexually transmitted infections compared to other age groups despite increasing diversity in the available tools to reduce HIV risk through behavioral strategies, biomedical methods, and treatment as prevention. Previous research has shown that acceptability and appeal of prevention methods vary across youth, and over-emphasis on any one strategy may overlook youth's autonomy to make their own informed decisions about their sexual health. We use a socioecological framework to understand factors influencing sexual health promotion choices among youth at-risk for or living with HIV. Youth ages 16-24 years old in Los Angeles and New Orleans participated in a strengths-based coaching intervention in Adolescent HIV Medicine Trials Network (ATN) studies. A total of 257 youth completed a baseline strengths assessment with a coach. We analyzed qualitative strengths assessment coach case notes to understand youth's sexual health promotion preferences and influencing factors across socioecological levels. Participants described 7 types of sexual health promotion strategies: Relationship dynamics; Not sexually active; STI testing; Condom use; PrEP use; PEP use; and HIV Viral suppression. Participants also described factors at intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community levels that impacted their preferred sexual health promotion strategies. Youth at-risk for or living with HIV make informed decisions around their sexual health based on a variety of intersecting factors across socioecological levels. These complex decisions demonstrate youth's autonomy and emphasize the importance of better incorporating patient-centered care within youth's sexual health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.