Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467068›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Minimally Invasive Tubular Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cohort Study of 756 Patients.

Aaron Lerch, Anthony Minh Tien Chau, Silvia Garcia Martin, Amir Amiri, Antonio Tsahtsarlis, Jason Papacostas, Jason McMillen, Amelia Jardim, Robert Campbell, Brendan Davis and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Aaron LerchBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-9764
Anthony Minh Tien ChauBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Silvia Garcia MartinBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amir AmiriBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Antonio TsahtsarlisBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jason PapacostasBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jason McMillenBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amelia JardimBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert CampbellBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Brendan DavisBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mark MidwinterSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Damian AmatoBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Martin WoodBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre (BCNC), Mater Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study using Nested Matched Case-Control Analysis.ObjectivesHigh-volume data to describe the complication profile and factors associated with reoperation after minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) in the short-term (<30 days) and long-term (>30 days).MethodsAll tubular TLIFs (2011-2024) were retrospectively reviewed, performed by eight neurosurgeons at our single centre. Two matched controls per reoperation case were manually selected. Each control had undergone the same primary procedure within six months of the index case, at the same levels and, if possible, by the same surgeon. Variables included demographics, comorbidities, frailty indices, private/public status, workplace injury, preoperative antithrombotics, preoperative laboratory results, the symptomatic indications, surgical factors, and clinical outcomes. Univariate logistic regression identified candidate variables for multivariate analysis.ResultsFrom 756 patients, there was a 6.6% reoperation rate (n=50), with mean follow-up of 1.5 (±1.7) years. Short-term reoperation was predominantly for cage migration and multivariate analysis revealed no independent predictors. Long-term reoperation was mainly for cage migration and was associated with private-funding, WorkCover status, osteoporosis/osteopenia, and previous lumbar surgery. Combined timeframe reoperations were associated with WorkCover status, osteoporosis/osteopenia, diabetes, and previous lumbar surgery.Patients who had reoperations fared worse than their matched controls. Additionally, a worse patient outcome was associated with diabetes, a higher Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and previous lumbar surgery.ConclusionThis retrospective case-control series reports our complication profile and factors associated with reoperation and poor patient outcomes after tubular TLIFs. Reoperation was associated with osteoporosis/osteopenia, diabetes, private-funding, WorkCover status, and previous lumbar surgery at another spinal level.

Indexed as

lumbar fusionminimally invasive spine surgeryreoperationrisk factorsTLIFtransforaminal lumbar interbody fusiontubular TLIF

Identifiers

PMID42467068
PMCPMC13379521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.