Observational studyBlood advances2026
Long-term experience with emicizumab in people with hemophilia A in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Canadian emicizumab registry: a blueprint for the future.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEmicizumab prophylaxis has been approved in Canada for the prevention or reduction of bleeding episodes in people with congenital hemophilia A (PwHA). Using routinely collected health data from the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR), this observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of emicizumab in PwHA. Deidentified data from the CBDR were collected for PwHA who had received ≥1 dose of emicizumab from 2018 up to 31 December 2023. Intrapatient comparisons of annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for all reported bleeds before and after emicizumab were performed using a negative binomial regression model. Overall, 710 PwHA received ≥1 emicizumab dose, and 539 (75.9%) had >1 year of emicizumab exposure. During the observational period, the safety profile was in keeping with previous reports; 34 adverse events were observed, including 2 thrombotic events (1 unlikely related to emicizumab; 1 probably related to previous use of eptacog alfa and/or possibly related to previous emicizumab, and associated with a central venous access device). Over a median (first to third quartiles) follow-up time of 549 (374-690) days, 439 (61.8%) PwHA had no recorded bleeds. Mean ABR decreased from 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.14) before emicizumab to 0.47 (95% CI, 0.40-0.55) after emicizumab (rate ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]; P< .001). A notable decrease in bleeds and sustained bleed control were observed in this population for up to a 5-year follow-up period. Continued follow-up will allow for greater quantification of this impact over time, providing valuable information to health care practitioners and regulatory authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.